Applied Psychology - Specialty: Clinical Sexology I 23-PSDM-SEK
The aim of the course is to familiarize participants with contemporary sexological knowledge and recognized approaches to key issues of the norm and pathology of psychosexual human functioning. The learning content includes the perspectives adopted by medicine and psychology as well as other disciplines of social knowledge (sociology, law, cultural anthropology).
The lecture part introduces the basic content and theoretical models ordering the perspective of the analysis of human sexual functioning and its conditions: taking into account developmental changes in human sexual experiences and behaviors in the life cycle, as well as etiopsychopathological mechanisms.
The purpose of seminar classes is to create an opportunity to reflect and disuss contemporary controversies regarding the sexual norm and pathology. Students develop and practise theirs skills of reading literature reflectively, identifiying the areas agreed in science and subject to polemics (issues unclear, still studied, influenced by social disputes). These classes are also aimed at bringing the students an opportunity to reflect on their own sexual attitudes and to analyze their eventual impact for clinical practice.
The purpose of the practice classes is to create opportunity for participants to acquire the skills to assess and differentiate between normative and non-normative psychosexual functioning at various stages of adult life. In particular, the classes are designed to teach the students the use of various types of psychological methods in the process of diagnosis of patient's sexuality: the types of these methods, specific tools and the procedures of conducting them, interpretation of their results and referring these results to the problem reported by a person diagnosed.
Module learning aims
Information on where to find course materials
Major
Methods of teaching for learning outcomes achievement
Course module conducted remotely (e-learning)
Student workload (ECTS credits)
Cycle of studies
Module type
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
After completing the module and confirming the achievement of learning outcomes a student:
a) uses consciously selected theoretical approaches to analyze the sexual behavior of children, adolescents and adults.
b) is able to assess and differentiate sexual disorders and dysfunctions based on diagnostic classifications.
c) critically assesses the psychosexual functioning of a person in the context of his or her general health.
d) assesses the risk of disorders and their consequences on the basis of knowledge of the features of the biopsychosocial functioning of the individual
e) describes the controversy around the sexological norm criteria related to the cultural context.
f) initiates reflection on his/her own preferences and restrictions regarding taking up work in the field of sexology.
Assessment criteria
Seminars:
a) 80% attendance, preparation for classes (reading the literature) and active participation in them;
b) obtaining a positive grade from the oral colloquium (presentation of two randomly selected topics from the discussed during classes and described in obligatory literature, a list of topics available in the e-learning module). Assessment according to the grading scale at UAM:
very good (5.0): the answer contains correctly reproduced knowledge (a comprehensive presentation of theoretical models or their concepts, research results) and is illustrated with relevant examples or comments
good plus (4,5): the answer contains correctly reproduced knowledge (presentation of theoretical models or their concepts, research results) and is illustrated with relevant examples, including minor deficiencies
good (4,0): the answer contains correctly reproduced knowledge (basic presentation of theoretical models or their concepts, research results) and correct analysis of the example given by the examiner; the answer contains minor deficiencies or minor errors
satisfactory plus (3.5): the answer contains basically correctly reproduced knowledge (basic presentation of theoretical models or their concepts, research results) and basically correct analysis of the example given by the examiner; the answer contains deficiencies or minor errors
satisfactory (3.0): the answer contains basically correctly reproduced knowledge (basic presentation of theoretical models or their concepts, research results) and basically correct analysis of the example given by the examiner; the answer contains clear deficiencies or errors, which, however, do not distort the essence of the issues discussed
Insufficient (ndst; 2.0): the response is significantly incomplete or contains numerous significant errors
Exercises:
a) 80% attendance, preparation for classes (reading the literature) and active participation in them;
b) obtaining a positive assessment of written works. Grade according to the grading scale at UAM.
very good (5.0): the work fully meets the set requirements for the implementation of individual diagnostic tasks
good plus (4.5): the work meets the set requirements for the implementation of tasks, contains single and minor errors or shortcomings
good (4,0): the work meets the basic requirements for the implementation of tasks, contains minor errors or shortcomings
satisfactory plus (3.5): the work meets the set requirements for the implementation of tasks, contains larger errors or shortcomings, but does not distort the essence of the results of the diagnosis
satisfactory (3.0): the work meets the basic requirements for the implementation of tasks, contains numerous and larger errors or shortcomings, but does not distort the essence of the results of the diagnosis
insufficient (2.0): the work does not meet the basic requirements for the implementation of tasks, contains numerous major errors or shortcomings distorting the essence of the results of the diagnosis
The condition of taking the exam is obtaining a positive grade from the seminars and exercises.
The exam grade is the average of two components: 4 mid-term knowledge tests in the e-learning module and a written problem exam that takes place during the exam session.
Mid-term test evaluation criteria:
very good (5.0): 91-100% correct answers
good plus (4.5): 81-90% of correct answers
good (4,0): 71-80% of correct answers
satisfactory plus (3.5): 61-70% of correct answers
satisfactory (3.0): 51-60% of correct answers
insufficient (2.0): 50 and below correct answers
Criteria for assessment of the problem exam: each of three equivalent questions is subject to a separate assessment, according to the criteria described at the point regarding seminars. A positive assessment of the work is possible when at least two answers to questions have obtained a positive assessment.
Bibliography
Bancroft, J. (2011). Seksualność człowieka. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław (r. 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 14, 15)
Beisert M. (2006), Rozwojowa norma seksuologiczna jako kryterium oceny zachowań seksualnych dzieci i młodzież, "Dziecko krzywdzone. Teoria, badania, praktyka" nr 16.
Beisert, M. (2006), Seksualność w cyklu życia człowieka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, r. 1,2,5,6.
Bem, S. (2000). Męskość kobiecość. O różnicach wynikających z płci. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Fragment „Dążenie do eliminacji polaryzacji rodzaju”, s. 181-185.
Bojarska K., Kowalczyk R. (2017). Tożsamości seksualne. W: Z. Lew-Starowicz, V. Skrzypulec-Plinta (red.) Seksuologia. Warszawa: PZWL. (s. 102- 112)
Butcher, J.N., Hooley, J.M., Mineka, S. (2017). Psychologia zaburzeń DSM 5. Sopot: GWP (Dysfunkcje seksualne, s. 534 – 548).
Chodecka, A., Zielona-Jenek, M. (2010). Jestem dziewczynką - jestem chłopcem. Gdańsk: GWP. (Rozdział 5 - część o środowiskach rodzinnych).
Fajkowska-Stanik, M. (2001). Transseksualizm i rodzina. Przekaz pokoleniowy wzorów relacyjnych w rodzinach transseksualnych kobiet. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytytu Psychologii PAN, SWPS. (r.2.4. Postępowanie lecznicze w przypadku transseksualizmu, s. 56-64).
Formalik, I. (2017). Mam autyzm. Mam seksualność. I co dalej? Łódź: Fundacja JiM. (str. 179-204; 255-330).
Iniewicz, G, Mijas, M., Grabski, B. (2012). Wprowadzenie do psychologii LGBT. Wrocław: Continuo. Rozdz. 7.
Izdebska, A. (2008). Boylovers - fałszywe oblicze przyjaźni. W: Aleksandra Jodko, Michał Pozdał (red.). Tabu seksuologii. Wątpliwości, trudne problemy, dylematy seksuologii i edukacji zdrowotnej. (s. 85-96). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SWPS Academica.
Izdebski, Z. (2012). Seksualność Polaków na początku XXI wieku. Kraków: wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Rozdział Seksualność w dobie zagrożeń pandemią HIV/AIDS (s. 507-552).
Leiblum, S., Rosen, R. (2005). Wprowadzenie. Terapia seksualna w epoce Viagry. W: S. Leiblum, R. Rosen (red.) Terapia zaburzeń seksualnych. Gdańsk: GWP. (s. 19-32)
Leiblum, S.R., Segraves, R.T. (2005). Terapia seksualna osób w podeszłym wieku. W: S.R. Leiblum, R.C. Rosen (red.), Terapia zaburzeń seksualnych (s. 487-516). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Lew-Starowicz, Z. (2017). Zaburzenia seksualne uwarunkowane kulturowo. W: M. Lew-Starowicz, Z. Lew-Starowicz, V. Skrzypulec-Plinta (red.) Seksuologia. Warszawa: PZWL. (s. 525 - 531).
Laplanche, J., Pontalis, J.B. (1996). Słownik psychoanalizy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne. Hasło: perwersja.
Lew-Starowicz, Z., Stusiński, J. (2015). Norma kliniczna w seksuologii. W: Z. Lew-Starowicz, A. Przyłuska-Fiszer, J. Stusiński (red.), Normy i kontrowersje etyczne w seksuologii (s. 33-44). Sopot: GWP.
Osajda, K. (2009). Cywilnoprawne aspekty zmiany płci u transseksualistów. W: R. Wieruszewski, M. Wyrzykowski (red.). Orientacja seksualna i tożsamość płciowa. Aspekty prawne i społeczne. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy EuroPrawo. (s. 179-202)
Pridal, C.G., LoPiccolo, J. (2005). Wieloczynnikowa terapia zaburzeń pożądania. W: S.R. Leiblum, R.C. Rosen (red.), Terapia zaburzeń seksualnych (s. 79-103). Gdańsk: GWP.
Przyłuska-Fiszer, A. (2015). Kodeks etyczny seksuologa klinicznego w świetle zasad etyki lekarskiej. W: Z. Lew-Starowicz, A. Przyłuska-Fiszer, J. Stusiński (red.). Normy i kontrowersje etyczne w seksuologii. Sopot: GWP.
PTP (1992). Kodeks etyczno-zawodowy psychologa.
PTS (2017). Kodeks etyczny Polskiego Towarzystwa Seksuologicznego. http://pts-seksuologia.pl/images/ckeditor_photos/KODEKSPTSost.pdf_____58e4863387a45.pdf
Stusiński, J. Lew-Starowicz, Z. (2015). Naruszanie granic i nieprzestrzeganie zasad etyki zawodowej w terapii seksualnej. W: Z. Lew-Starowicz, A. Przyłuska-Fiszer, J. Stusiński (red.). Normy i kontrowersje etyczne e seksuologii. Sopot: GWP.
Tryjarska, B. (2011). Kategorie do opisu relacji między członkami rodziny – bliskość, autonomia, władza. W: M. Święcicka (red.) Metody diagnozy w psychologii klinicznej dziecka i rodziny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Paradygmat.
Wciórka, J., Pużyński, S. (2000). Klasyfikacja zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10, TOM 1 -2 (Opisy kliniczne i wskazówki diagnostyczne + Badawcze kryteria diagnostyczne). Kraków: Vesalius
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. (2018). ICD-11 INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY STATISTICS. https://icd.who.int/en
Zielona-Jenek, M. (2018). Preferencje seksualne i związane z nimi zaburzenia: W stronę rozszerzonego modelu opisu. Psychiatria Polska, 52 (6), 1063-1073.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: