Poznań School of Methodology: genesis - achievements - significance 08-PIE-PSM
SYLLABUS:
Week 1: The main periods in history of Polish Philosophy
Week 2. Poznań school of methodology in the context of postwar history of Polish philosophy
Week 3: History of Poznań school of methodology: institutions, people, theories and concepts
Week 4: Jerzy Kmita: around humanistic interpretation
Week 5: Jerzy Kmita: historical epistemology
Week 6: Jerzy Kmita: socio-regulative theory of culture
Week 7: Leszek Nowak: idealizational theory of science - main ideas
Week 8: Leszek Nowak: idealizational theory of science – extensions and reception
Week 9: Leszek Nowak: paradox of historism in adaptive interpretation of historical materialism
Week 10: Non-Marxian historical materialism as refutation of Marxism
Week 11: Theory of real socialism
Week 12:Anthropological foundations of theory of historical process
Week 13: Jerzy Topolski: theory of historical source and the structure of historical narrative
Week 14: Jerzy Topolski: the concept of integrative explanation: ideas and examples
Week 15: The significance of PSM in history of Polish philosophy
Module learning aims
Information on where to find course materials
Major
Methods of teaching for learning outcomes achievement
Course module conducted remotely (e-learning)
Student workload (ECTS credits)
Module type
Pre-requisites in terms of knowledge, skills and social competences
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
The student will be acquainted with
- historical conditions of development of Polish philosophy after the Second World War,
- notions of the scientific school, intellectual milieu and paradigm.
- main concepts of Poznań School of Methodology
- the significance of the school in the Polish humanities and social sciences
Assessment criteria
5 – excellent knowledge and ability of independent analysis, capability of formulation of problems and their solution with an application of notion apparatus
4.5 – very good knowledge although there are some mistakes; an ability of independent analysis, capability of formulation of problems and their solutions;
4.0 – good knowledge; an ability of formulation of problems and their solutions requires some aid
3.5 – satisfactory knowledge and formulation of problems and their solutions requires a control of the lecturer
3.0 – satisfactory knowledge but there are numerous mistakes, the lack of independent analysis and inability of formulation of problems and their solutions
2.0 – unsatisfactory knowledge
Practical placement
not relevant
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: