Historical Distinctiveness of Central Europe 08-FLFA-HDI
Week 1: On Metanarrative in Philosophy of History and its critics (Berlin, Popper, Lyotard, Tucker)
Week 2: On concepts of Central Europe
Week 3: Conceptualizations of developmental distinctiveness of Central Europe (Marian Małowist, Immanuel Wallerstein, Robert Brenner, Jerzy Topolski)
Week 4: Conceptualizations of developmental distinctiveness of Central Europe (Daniel Chirot, Władysław Rusiński, Jeremy Blum, Jan Rutkowski, Benedykt Zientara)
Week 5: Methodological assumptions: On modelling in history
Week 6: Methodological assumptions: The cascade process and theory of chaos
Week 7: Theoretical assumptions: main ideas of Non-Marxian historical materialism
Week 8: Theoretical assumptions: theory of power
Week 9: Theoretical assumptions: on two kinds of economic revolution
Week 10: The peculiarities of social structure of Teutonic Knight Order
Week 11: The development of feudalism in Central Europe
Week 12: The genesis of second serfdom: the main trends in development of Polish society (X-XVII)
Week 13: The genesis of second serfdom: the development of Czech society (X-XVII)
Week 14: The genesis of second serfdom: the development of Hungarian society (X-XVII)
Week 15: The consequences of historical differentiation of Central Europe
Module learning aims
Major
Methods of teaching for learning outcomes achievement
Course module conducted remotely (e-learning)
Pre-requisites in terms of knowledge, skills and social competences
Course coordinators
Assessment criteria
5 – excellent knowledge and ability of independent analysis, capability of formulation of problems and their solution with an application of notion apparatus
4.5 – very good knowledge although there are some mistakes; an ability of independent analysis, capability of formulation of problems and their solutions;
4.0 – good knowledge; an ability of formulation of problems and their solutions requires some aid
3.5 – satisfactory knowledge and formulation of problems and their solutions requires a control of the lecturer
3.0 – satisfactory knowledge but there are numerous mistakes, the lack of independent analysis and inability of formulation of problems and their solutions
2.0 – unsatisfactory knowledge
Practical placement
not relevant
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: